Amazingly, this is the mid-semester point and it seems
like a good idea to do some reflection on how this process of blogging and
reflection has impacted my learning so far.
And so I have read back over my posts here and looked again as some of my
comments on the class discussion boards, looking to see how my thoughts have
changed and what themes have been central to what I have found to be most
interesting.
Looking first at the changes over the semester so far, I
realize that the parts of library science and the current issues that
interested me at the beginning of the semester continue to interest me. However, my thoughts about them are much more
concrete and developed and the knowledge I have about them has greatly
increased. For example, one of the early
discussions in class was about whether librarianship is a profession. I thought that this discussion was a bit of a
waste of time. Why did it matter? However, as I researched a paper of my chosen
“library leader,” Melvil Dewy, I realized that this is a discussion that has
been going on since before the beginning of modern library science. And is affects both how we train and educate
new librarians and how we practice. This
information but that discussion and context and I might answer the question
differently now, or at least give it more wait.
The other change I have noticed is a result of the
opportunity to reflect here on this blog.
I had not previously recognized that I was interested in eventually
being in a management position in a library.
But as I read about the need for experienced managers in libraries and
thought about my experiences and gifts, this seemed like a career past that I
should explore. Without the opportunity to
do some weekly, structured reflection on what I am learning and what my gifts
are, I am not sure I would feel this sense of direction and clarity.
Even in the midst of this growth and change, there are consistent
themes that have persisted throughout these first few weeks. I still am interested in public library work
in an urban setting. I do have a better
understanding of what that means and what skills I will need for that
work. Another issue for me that
continues to arise, particularly in the class discussions, is about how we make
collection decisions at public libraries. As librarians, we value free and open access
to information and oppose censorship in all its forms. However, what about materials that are
clearly racist? Or pornographic? How do we make those determinations? Does it matter if the materials are created
for adults or children? Or what if the
community we serve decides that they do not want particular materials in their
library? We are supposed to serve the
public, but what if the public asks us to do something that is against some of
the other values we hold? How does one
balance these competing values and needs?
I’m not sure that there are clear cut answers to these questions, but I
desire to have more of a conversation about them.
As the semester continues, I would like to continue to
learn more about all of these areas. The
conversations I am having with my classmates have been very helpful and
illuminating. Each of them has different
experiences and goals, and their paths help me see mine more clearly and to
widen the possibilities. I look forward
to much more learning and understanding.